As my mom
and I drove through Vermont this past week during spring break, we passed
dozens of sugar shacks and maple syrup farms. Along the way we stopped for
maple ice cream and similar treats containing Vermont's very own maple syrup. A
couple days later, I came across a New York Times article about maple syrup! Is
that good timing or what?! I didn't really know much about it going into the article;
my only background was the sweet taste of the syrup. One thing that I did know
was that while shopping for maple syrup at the grocery store two seemingly
identical bottles sat next two each other. They both read "Organic Maple
Syrup", but one was in a plastic bottle and the other was in a glass
bottle. The plastic one was cheaper but was this the only factor that made it different? My mom and I
turned the bottles over to compare the ingredients. Bingo! The glass 'All
Organic' bottle had one ingredient, Pure Maple Syrup, while the plastic 'All
Organic' bottle included a couple extra ingredients including 'organic corn
syrup.' I have never heard of 'organic corn syrup' but corn in any form in
maple syrup can't be too 'natural.' And unfortunately, this is exactly what we
are headed for, more and more 'unnatural' maple syrup.
Climate change is
disrupting temperatures in Vermont and causing great stress among syrup
farmers. As a result, American maple syrup farmers have been forced to invest
thousands of dollars in technology and machinery never needed before. With the
high-tech equipment, farmers can now “process sap into syrup in 30 minutes, something that used
to take two hours.” They are betting on technology and “installing equipment that may
take 10 years to earn back their cost in syrup sales.” Although scientists say the
technology is not harming the maples in anyway, it is the dependency that
concerns me. The technology behind producing maple syrup is just another
example of how each generation after the other today has become more and more
dependent on technology. Similar to what I brought up in my Gas in the Natural Cycle, we are caught in a linear progression that is, I believe, 'unnatural' to nature's cycle because as we continue to increase our dependence on technology it causes climate change among other things, and in turn causes an even bigger increase in technology. So the big question now is: how do we move back to a more cyclical progression? And is it even possible?
No comments:
Post a Comment