When I hear the word cheating I think of kids-- Kids wanting to do well on tests so they can get a better grade, right? No, not right. This week the
New York Times published an extensive article about Atlanta's former district superintendent Beverly Hall who was found to be cheating; in fact, she "was charged with racketeering, theft and other crimes in the doctoring of students' test answers." Why even change the test answers? I mean, we are talking about elementary school here. The test scores brought Dr. Hall fame and fortune. She was named superintendent of the year in 2009 by the American Association of School Administrators and was hosted at the White House by the secretary of education, Arne Duncan. The fortune -- "she earned more than $500,000 in performance bonuses while superintendent." This is where greed and selfishness really comes out. Dr. Hall wasn't in it for the students because she wanted them to get better test scores; she was in it for herself, popularity, prosperity and all. Is it really worth such a high risk for the high reward? We are finding more often than not, that the answer is no!
|
A 2½-year investigation has gone on because Beverly L. Hall
was suspected to have changing students test answers. |
In Dr. Hall's case, though the risk was high, her reward was higher. She "led the district of 52,000 children, many of them poor and African-American, Atlanta students often outperformed wealthier suburban districts on state tests." A little bit fishy? The investigation began in August 2010 when test scores increased substantially yet a high number of eraser marks were found on the answer sheets from wrong to right. Third grade teacher, at Venetian Hills Elementary School, Jackie Parks admitted to the wrong doing, complied with Georgia state investigator, Richard Hyde, and wore a wire to record conversations. She admitted that she was among "the chosen" -- one of seven teachers "who sat in a locked windowless room every afternoon during the week of state testing, raising students' scores by erasing wrong answers and making them right." The teachers said they would do this because of the fear and standard Dr. Hall set among them.
"Dr.Hall was known to rule by fear. She gave principals three years to meet their
testing goals. Few did; in her decade as superintendent, she replaced 90 percent
of the principals. Teachers and principals whose students had high test scores
received tenure and thousands of dollars in performance bonuses. Otherwise, as
one teacher explained, it was 'low score out the door.'"
It really is only to the benefit of the woman herself. Higher scores means less financial aid from the state. Less aid means the students may not even learn what they are supposed to or increasingly fall behind. The selfishness just becomes more and more apparent. Beverly Hall was the leader of the other 34 accused last Friday.